Democrats have been struggling to force their radical agenda through Congress, so now they are trying to pack the Supreme Court by adding 4 additional justices. House Democrats, led by Jerry Nadler, unveiled the Judiciary Act of 2021 last week, which would ultimately expand the Supreme Court from 9 to 13 justices.
After the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett last year, President Trump had effectively managed to reshape the Supreme Court for the next several decades (which is arguably one of his most tangible accomplishments). Thanks to President Trump, the Supreme Court now has a 6-3 majority, creating a huge problem for Democrats. Unable to ram through their radical agenda without interference from the courts, many Democrats are now seeking to change any rule they find a nuisance or a hinderance. That’s nothing new for them, though.
Until recently, there have not been any serious attempts to pack the courts. The most recent attempt was by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1937. When the Supreme Court repeatedly struck down various pieces of New Deal legislation, FDR decided he would simply change the rules. He made a proposal to add more members to the court, but the proposal was ultimately struck down by Congress and the number of seats remained at 9 – the same number of seats since 1869.
President Biden did not take a clear stance on court packing during the 2020 presidential campaign, but in 1983, then-Senator Joe Biden said court packing was a “bonehead idea.” He also went so far as to say during a 2019 primary debate that packing the Supreme Court would destroy “any credibility the court has at all.” However, since taking office, Biden has been laying the groundwork for a commission to study expanding the Supreme Court.
Despite efforts by many Democrats in the House to pack the court, Nancy Pelosi has realized how strong the opposition to court packing is among House Republicans and even some House Democrats. Soon after the Judiciary Act of 2021 was introduced last week, Pelosi was forced to go on the record and admit she does not have the votes to bring this court packing legislation to the floor for a vote. Even though the Democrats have a majority in the House, the margins are extremely thin, so Pelosi can no longer completely ignore Republican opposition to her radical agenda.
Packing the Supreme Court would further politicize the institution and would be a horrible deal for all Americans. Several of my Republican colleagues and I have sponsored a resolution that, if enacted, would add an amendment to the Constitution permanently limiting the Supreme Court to 9 justices. I am optimistic that our efforts to stop this dangerous court packing plan will be successful so we can stop this partisan power grab and protect our nation’s institutions.
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016